Answer Details

Here are **three U.S. TikTok accounts** focused on political news that have relatively strong credentials. That said, *“trustworthy”* is always relative—TikTok skews informal, short-form, and algorithm-driven, so it’s wise to cross-check everything. According to research from Pew Research Center and others, though TikTok is increasingly a news source, it mixes entertainment + memes + commentary, which can complicate reliability. ([Pew Research Center][1]) --- ### 1) V Spehar (TikTok: @underthedesknews)       **Why they stand out:** * They are a former hospitality worker turned journalist/creator, using the “Under The Desk News” brand to deliver succinct political & current-events overviews. ([Wikipedia][2]) * Recognised for innovation: included in TIME100 Creators 2025. ([TIME][3]) * They emphasise sourcing, clarity, and “making news less scary”. ([underthedesknews.substack.com][4]) **Caveats:** * Though stronger than many, the format is still short-form so depth is limited. * Their coverage will still reflect personal framing/lens—even experienced creators bring perspective. --- ### 2) Brian Tyler Cohen (TikTok: @briantylercohen)       **Why they stand out:** * Established political commentator and journalist; hosts “No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen”, interviews top political figures. ([Wikipedia][5]) * Has cross-platform presence (YouTube, podcast) which suggests higher resource/investment than casual creator. **Caveats:** * Known to lean progressive; so one must recognise the partisan framing when assessing claims. * Even long-form creators summarising politics in TikTok format will simplify. --- ### 3) Aaron Parnas (TikTok: @aaronparnas1)       **Why they stand out:** * Lawyer-turned–social-media creator focused on U.S. politics, legal issues. ([Wikipedia][6]) * Large TikTok following (~4M+), so their reach means more visibility and scrutiny. **Caveats:** * As with any creator, there are noted critiques: some concerns around sourcing or framing in certain-international-conflict coverage. ([Wikipedia][6]) * Heavy volume of short videos means less time per topic; always good to consult primary sources. --- ### Some *Important Notes/Context* * Research shows that many TikTok news-accounts mix entertainment, memes, and commentary—a quote: “Most TikTok users see news-related content … but much of it comes through influencers or celebrities, not journalists.” ([Pew Research Center][1]) * The platform’s algorithm may favour polarising or sensational content, increasing risks of echo-chambers. ([Misinformation Review][7]) * Always verify: if a creator posts a specific claim, trace it back to an established news outlet, official document, or reliable expert. --- If you like, I can **pull together a longer list** (e.g., 8-10 TikTok news accounts across the political spectrum) with short notes on leanings, strengths & weaknesses. Would you like that? [1]: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2024/06/12/tiktok-users-experiences-with-news/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "1. TikTok users’ experiences with news - Pew Research Center" [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_Spehar?utm_source=chatgpt.com "V Spehar" [3]: https://time.com/collections/time100-creators-2025/7299181/under-the-desk-news/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Under the Desk News Is on the 2025 TIME100 Creators List | TIME" [4]: https://underthedesknews.substack.com/about?utm_source=chatgpt.com "About - Under the Desk News" [5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Tyler_Cohen?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Brian Tyler Cohen" [6]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Parnas?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Aaron Parnas" [7]: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/toxic-politics-and-tiktok-engagement-in-the-2024-u-s-election/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Toxic politics and TikTok engagement in the 2024 U.S. election"